Members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints are well versed in the Word of Wisdom, the admonition in Doctrine and Covenants 89 which lays out the Lord’s law of health to the Church; however, the vast majority of members of the Church do nothing to implement the Word of Wisdom’s admonition to eat meat sparingly, and only in times of winter, or of cold, or of famine.

Despite the clarification from Church leaders on caffeinated soft drinks, many members of the church would raise an eyebrow to someone bringing Dr. Pepper to the church pot luck, but it is likely that no one would think twice about the barbecued hamburgers.

Two years ago I decided to take significant strides toward improved health and fitness.  I started that effort by carefully reading Doctrine and Covenants 89 and seeing what I could do to more perfectly follow the commandment.  Verses 12 and 13 stood out to me.  Though I had read them many times before, I had never actually made even the slightest effort to implement them.

The following is the result of my study on Doctrine and Covenants 89’s admonition to eat meat sparingly.  It contains my best efforts to understand the doctrine of the church, but I fully admit that most of it is based on my own assumptions and current understanding.  To understand the doctrine for yourself, you need to seek out the ultimate source of knowledge.

What Doctrine and Covenants 89 Actually Says

“Yea, flesh also of beasts and of the fowls of the air, I, the Lord, have ordained for the use of man with thanksgiving; nevertheless they are to be used sparingly; And it is pleasing unto me that they should not be used, only in times of winter, or of cold, or famine.”  Doctrine and Covenants 89: 12 and 13

A plain reading of the text makes any interpretation other than “Don’t eat meat unless it is winter or famine, and even then, do so sparingly” difficult to justify.  Any reasonable reader would understand that to be the plain meaning.

But sometimes things are less obvious than they seem.  I’m an attorney (non-practicing), so I know something about twisting other people’s words (that’s a joke… sort of).

The Comma and the 1920 Edition of the Word of Wisdom

Like I said, sometimes things aren’t as obvious as they may seem.  In the original text of the Word of Wisdom, there is no comma between the words “used” and “only.”  Here is a copy of the original text (highlighting the area of interest) that covers two pages in the original manuscript.



Can you see how to, entirely opposite, interpretations can come from the text depending on how this is read?  With the comma, it reads “It is pleasing unto me that they should not be used ONLY in times of winter or of cold or of famine.”  Which would seem to say we should be eating meat all the time–not only in those conditions.

But without the comma, which is how the manuscript originally reads and how it was written in every edition of the Doctrine and Covenants up to the 1920 edition, it reads “It is pleasing unto me that they should NOT be used–only in times of winter, or of cold, or of famine.”

Two opposite interpretations–all hinging upon a single comma.  So why was the comma added? As even a cursory study of the manuscripts of the Doctrine and Covenants will reveal, the documents were written when grammar, spelling, punctuation, and other writing fundamentals were still being standardized, and they were written by fallible men who did not possess perfect abilities to communicate the revelation that Joseph Smith received.

I personally believe the comma is the correct way for the revelation to be written, and that according to our modernized literary forms, it is the grammatically correct version.  Without it, the preceding verse makes little sense.  Birch, A. Jane, “Questioning the Comma in Verse 13 of the Word of Wisdom” (2014). All Faculty Publications. Paper 1402.

The Plot Thickens…

Whenever I have taken occasion to converse with other members of the church about this topic to try and learn more, many of them have pointed me to Doctrine and Covenants 49:18, the revelation Joseph Smith received for Leman Copley, a former Shaker.

Before we read the verse, it is significant to look at the context of the verses before, which contain instructions to not forbid others to marry.

The verse in question says, “And whoso forbiddeth to abstain from meats, that man should not eat the same, is not ordained of God.”  This, at first, seems to be an outright contradiction to the admonition in Doctrine and Covenants 89 to only eat meat in times of winter, or of cold, or of famine, and even then it should be done sparingly.

This is where the plot thickens.

Look at the footnote for this verse for the word “forbiddeth” and you’ll see the footnote says, “biddeth.”  These words are often confused, but are opposites.  “I forbid you to attend church” means the exact opposite of “I bid you to attend church.”  When Jacob finished his portion of the Book of Mormon, surely he did not mean “I FORBID you adieu.”  Source: Jim Catano.

As best as I understand, I believe the footnote in this verse to simply be an error.

Leaving the contradiction aside, we can read the actual text more carefully and uncover a possible explanation for the contradiction between 89 and 49.  The verse says only that people should not teach others, or forbid others to not eat meat.”  While unlikely, it is possible that the text is actually saying that it is wrong to teach others not to eat meat, because the Lord’s law on health is adapted to the weakest of the Saints, and not everyone is ready to live that law.  I personally find that to be plausible, but frankly not likely.

What Are the Church Leaders Saying Today?

When you search “eat meat sparingly” on, only TWO such admonitions are found in any general conference.  TWO!

The first mention is from Ezra Taft Benson in 1983: “In this revelation the Lord counsels us to use meat sparingly. I have often felt that the Lord is further counseling us in this revelation against indiscriminately killing animals, for He has said elsewhere in scripture, ‘Wo be unto man that sheddeth blood or that wasteth flesh and hath no need.” (D&C 49:21.)’

President Benson seems to play down the health benefit and suggest that the commandment may have a deeper root in the protection of human life.

President Packer said in a 1996 conference report: “…the Word of Wisdom counsels us to eat meat sparingly. Lest someone become extreme, we are told in another revelation that “whoso forbiddeth to [eat meat] is not ordained of God.”

Historical Insight from Early Church Leaders

In law, after a plain reading of a law is done and then the text is examined in greater detail, outside information can then be referenced to try and understand what was intended to be written.   Here is further information from early church leaders…

  • “…it is pleasing saith the Lord that flesh be used only in times of winter, or of famine’-and why to be used in famine? because all domesticated animals would naturally die, and may as well be made use of by man, as not…”  Hyrum Smith, “The Word of Wisdom.”  Times and Seasons volume 3. 1 June 1842.
  • then-Apostle Lorenzo Snow “introduced the subject of the Word of Wisdom, expressing the opinion that it was violated as much or more in the improper use of meat as in other things, and thought the time was near at hand when the Latter-day Saints should be taught to refrain from meat eating and the shedding of animal blood.” (Journal History, 11 March 1897 p. 2)
    Elder Snow “was convinced that the killing of animals when unnecessary was wrong and sinful, and that it was not right to neglect one part of the Word of Wisdom and be too strenuous in regard to other parts.” (Journal History, 5 May 1893, pp. 2-3)
  • Elder Joseph F. Merrill “When protein is taken in great excess of the body’s need, as is usually the case in the diet of Americans, added work is given the liver and kidneys, the circulation is over-stimulated and the “factor of safety” of these organs is exceeded”
  • President Heber J. Grant stated, “I think that another reason I have very splendid strength for an old man is that during the years we have had a cafeteria… I have not, with exception of not more than a dozen times, ordered meat of any kind. …I have endeavored to live the Word of Wisdom and that, in my opinion, is one reason for my good health.” (Conference Report, April 1937, p. 15)
  • John A. Widtsoe wrote in a book on the Word of Wisdom, “If one uses meat it must be used sparingly and in winter or famine only…. They who wish to be well and gain the promised reward stated in the Word of Wisdom must obey all of the law, not just part of it as suits their whim or their appetite, or their notion of its meaning.” (The Word of Wisdom, a Modern Interpretation, 1950)
  • President Joseph Fielding Smith’s wife, Jesse Evans Smith, said, “my husband doesn’t eat meat” and he felt a “disdain of meat and (a) love of vegetables.” (Brigham Young University Daily Universe, May 6, 1971, p. 1)
  • Elder Benson obviously felt some frustration about how well Americans do in their eating habits because he once observed, “To a significant degree, we are an overfed and undernourished nation digging an early grave with our teeth, and lacking the energy that could be ours…. We need a generation of young people who, as Daniel, eat in a more healthy manner than to fare on the ‘kings meat’ —and whose countenances show it.” (Teachings of Ezra Taft Benson pp. 476-7)
  • 49:18 is actually a warning to those who would prohibit others from abstaining from eating flesh rather than a condemnation of those who do abstain.
  • There is understandable reason for honest confusion on this point. First, there is an error in a footnote in the present edition of the LDS scriptures.  “I bid you to come to my house” is the exact opposite of “I forbid you to come to my house.” The inaccurate footnote prompts us to incorrectly believe that the person who asks another to abstain from meats is not ordained of God. However, the original scripture (which was published for 148 years without that footnote) teaches that he who forbids others to abstain from meats is the one who is not ordained of God. Furthermore, if forbid really meant bid it would alter 49:15 to also condemn “whoso ‘biddeth’ to marry.”  Source: Jim Catano
  • In this revelation the Lord counsels us to use meat sparingly. I have often felt that the Lord is further counseling us in this revelation against indiscriminately killing animals, for He has said elsewhere in scripture, “Wo be unto man that sheddeth blood or that wasteth flesh and hath no need.” (D&C 49:21.)  “A principle with a promise” Ezra Taft Benson. May 1983.


I have a tendency to sometimes be a little too pharisaical in my discipleship.  President Packer’s conference quote saying that it would be too extreme to refrain from eating meat entirely is instructive to me.

The counsel of the living prophets is most important.  I believe they are in communication with our Heavenly Father and that He will guide us when the church gets off course.  It is tough to argue with the fact that this clearly is not a point of emphasis in the church right now.  That doesn’t mean we shouldn’t care about the scripture, but that we need to be careful about becoming too extreme on a fringe issue.

It appears to me that the Lord’s commandment to eat sparingly may be rooted more deeply in the preservation of animals than in health, and is included in Doctrine and Covenants 89 as it is part of the decisions to be made about what foods to eat.  For me personally, I eat meat with restraint (a point strongly supported by heart health now) but do not go so extreme as to refrain from eating meat.

Obviously, this is a personal choice and this blog post should not in any way be considered representative of the church’s counsel on the topic, but I hope by writing these articles that those who would like to further develop their gospel scholarship will be pointed to resources they can study to make good decisions and grow closer to Heavenly Father.


  1. Whatever we eat, we would be wise to provide our bodies with the things they need to get energy and repair themselves. Meat has some of these things. If we choose not to eat meat (and it IS a choice to us) we should observe to get from other sources what nutrition we might otherwise have got from meat.

  2. This article was well reasoned and extremely helpful to me. I am a convert who has always been confused as to why this portion of the word of wisdom hasn’t been a bigger topic of conversation in the church. As more and more scientific research reveals the unquestioned benefits of a plant based diet, it would make sense to me that we would want to shine a light on this extremely prescient revelation to Joseph in 1830.
    I have eaten meat my entire life and just recently decided to cut way back after a little convincing from the documentary “What the health?”. Even if half of the evidence put forth in that film is true (the referenced litany of studies seem to hold water), it would still clearly support Joseph’s warning from so long ago.
    I do understand why a prominent focus is placed on alcohol and tobacco – the downstream negative cultural and economic impacts are unquestioned and immense. That said, I’ve often struggled with the hypocrisy of judgment and condemnation of those who choose to consume those substances coming from people who gorge themselves on Big Macs and T-bone steaks. The economic burden of preventable diabetes, heart disease and cancers are likewise detrimental to our society. You can’t selectively adhere to scripture, it just doesn’t work. Especially within the same passage of revelation.
    Whether for health or compassionate reasons ( shouldn’t really matter either way) this passage should not be so blatantly ignored or at best marginalized simply because ‘sparingly’ can mean different things to different people. If we’re being honest, it’s a very straightforward piece of scripture to interpret, while remaining an extremely difficult one to obey.

  3. A very interesting article!
    Maybe one of the reasons D&C sec 49:18 is confusing to some people is the descriptive paragraph at the beginning of the section. In scriptures published before 1978 it says, \”…Sanctity of marriage as a law of God unto man–Complete abstinence from meat not required…\” Since 1978 it says, \”Marriage is ordained of God…Eating of meat is approved.\”
    Also of interest is the pre-1978 heading for sec 89, \”… Abstinence from wine, strong drink, tobacco and hot drinks enjoined–Moderation in the eating of meat-…\” as opposed to the one we use now, \”…Herbs, fruits, flesh, and grain are ordained for the use of man…\” Judging by these, meat eating appears to be more approved of now. Why is this? Our factory farms and slaughter houses are not more humane now. Nor have humans evolved into carnivores.

  4. I’ve been studying this topic quite a bit lately and over the past couple years I have made some health related changes that include eating more “fruits of the vine” (I don’t think The Lord differentiates between fruits and vegetables) and I’ve felt much better and have been far more healthy. Recently, I’m recognizing the dangers of meat to our body and this has allowed me to recognize better what The Lord stated in the revelation.
    Along with this revelation I think we need to keep in mind this revelation in section 58:
    “26 For behold, it is not meet that I should command in all things; for he that is compelled in all things, the same is a slothful and not a wise servant; wherefore he receiveth no reward.

    27 Verily I say, men should be anxiously engaged in a good cause, and do many things of their own free will, and bring to pass much righteousness;

    28 For the power is in them, wherein they are agents unto themselves. And inasmuch as men do good they shall in nowise lose their reward.

    29 But he that doeth not anything until he is commanded, and receiveth a commandment with doubtful heart, and keepeth it with slothfulness, the same is damned.”

    If we require The Lord or his servants to always command us in all things rather than seeking to act for ourselves to do good we are not being wise or profitable.

  5. I have enjoyed the comments on this site.
    I used to eat burgers, fries and Cokes all the time. Also, I would buy expensive cuts of meat. Eating at quality restaurants, I would order a Dr Pepper or Coke. The waiter would refill my glass often, and I probably drank at least 24 to 40 oz of the carbonated drinks + tons of sugar!
    Years later, I changed my eating habits and lost about 30 pounds of ugly FAT. I live the Word of Wisdom and feel great!
    Veggies and quality fruits give me a new lease on life, together with drinking pure water. I am almost 80 and feel like a man in his 30’s.
    The Lord loves each of us and wants the best for us, including intelligent choices on our part. I wish you the best, also.

  6. It should be considered that the word, “meat” in it’s original form meant food in general and not just meat as we define it by animal flesh in our modern day.

    To be used in winter, cold famine implies a time of necessity. God is not literally saying it’s a good time to eat meat in winter when it’s cold outside. He is saying that meat is available to be used in extreme conditions.

    After all my research and knowing that in the coming day when the lion eats straw like the ox and there is officially no more shedding of blood, it encourages me to strive for that day now. We are commanded to progress ourselves and live for the coming day.

  7. There’s a beautiful YouTube video called “Return to Sparingly” which show some of these quotes with LDS music in the background.

    I stumbled across some info which took me by surprise. The Church went into the cattle ranching business during mid 1900s. This is about the time leaders stopped speaking about eating meat sparingly. The Church established themselves as the largest, privately-owned, for-profit ranchers in the United States. And for one year at the end of the 90s (‘97?), they were the largest privately-owned for-profit ranchers in the world. It’s hard to teach about not eating animals when you’re in the business of eating animals.

    I have a hard time believing that Heavenly Father judges coffee drinkers are too-unclean to be in his house but brutalizing and murdering his innocent creatures he created to feel pain and fear is perfectly okay.

    imo, any church leader who eats animals has no business judging others during a TR interview over whether or not the member drinks coffee or tea with breakfast, a glass of wine with dinner or smokes a cigarette.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *